Contact us
![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
Paper Publishing WeChat |
Useful Links
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Article
Author(s)
HOU Lanzhong
Full-Text PDF
XML 32 Views
DOI:10.17265/1548-6605/2025.06.002
Affiliation(s)
University of Liverpool, Liverpool,UK
ABSTRACT
Women’s pursuit of basic
reproductive rights, including the right to free abortion, has gone through a
long and complicated historical process. While this goal has yet to be fully
achieved, relevant legislation in many countries provides safeguards for it,
though numerous problems remain. This article examines the UK’s approach,
taking the Abortion Act 1967 as an example. Compared to the strict restrictions
of the past, this provision relaxed restrictions and reduced penalties for
abortion, hailed as a progressive, “woman-centred” measure and a major victory
for British women. However, in the context of modern society and the rapid
development of medical ethics, this law has gradually revealed its historical
limitations and lags, failing to fully respond to the complex demands of today
for reproductive justice and bodily autonomy. The issue of abortion involves
multiple legal, ethical, moral, medical, and social dimensions, requiring
analysis from a multidisciplinary perspective. Therefore, this article attempts
to combine feminist theory with “law and emotion” theory to analyse the
Abortion Act 1967, exploring its potential insights and contributions to the
development of abortion law, aiming to promote a more scientific, rational, and
humane approach to abortion law.
KEYWORDS
the Abortion Act 1967, feminism, law and emotion
Cite this paper
References