 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Ekkart Zimmermann
Full-Text PDF
XML 55 Views
DOI:10.17265/2328-2134/2025.04.004
Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
The analysis refers to the interwar years in Europe. We distinguish four types of coalitions here: (a) Coalitions with other democratic parties, led by a predominant party and most common in multi-party democratic states. (b) Bringing in ideological opponents on the parts of overarching highly credible national figures such as King George V did in Britain in 1931 in calling upon the charismatic Labour Party leader MacDonald to form a coalition with the still dominant but ailing Conservative Party. (c) The outbidding of more radical political parties by former center parties towards the right or left. One such outcome comes about when this is having a temporary effect only, until the next election is won within the family of democratic parties. Yet, when outbidding is trump the electorate easily might go for the hardest outbidding contender not to be taken over by even greater extremist parties. This process for the analysis of political terrorism and its intention to instigate fear amongst the “neutral” population explains to a large extent why considerable portions of the population are going to side with the most extreme challengers. This is for two reasons, one is pure fear to be out-mastered, the other one is rational choice just to avoid this. (d) The other outcome as to outbidding occurs when the democratic national consensus formation that is still underlying all these processes in normal times is wiped out in times of crises. Democratic national consensus is being lost vis-à-vis a new anti-democratic national consensus formation. Several other theoretical arguments and historical experiences are touched upon.
outbidding, democratic national consensus formation, power transition, center parties, transient democrat, populism, types of coalition, siding with most extreme challenges
Ekkart Zimmermann. (2025). Throw Out the Rascals Not the System: What Can We Learn for Democratic Survival From the Great Depression? International Relations and Diplomacy, July-Aug. 2025, Vol. 13, No. 4, 202-208.
Heberle, R. (1963). Landbevölkerung und Nationalsozialismus. Eine soziologische Untersuchung der politischen Willensbildung in Schleswig-Holstein 1918-1932. In Schriftenreihe der Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte. Stutgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.
Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kornhauser, W. (1959). The politics of mass society. New York: Free Press.
Lenin, V. (1902). What is to be done? (in Russian). Lenin’s Collected Works. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2019). How democracies die. What history reveals about our future. New York: Crown Publishers.
Linz, J. J. (1978). The breakdown of democratic regimes: Crisis, breakdown and reequilibration. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Luebbert, G. M. (1991). Liberalism, fascism, or social democracy: Social classes and the political origins of regimes in interwar Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pareto, V. (1991). The Rise and Fall of Elites. Piscataway, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
Przeworski, A. (2019). Crises of democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski, A., & Limongi, F. (1993). Political regimes and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 51-69.
Rogowski, R. (1989). Commerce and coalitions: How trade affects domestic political alignments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. London: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Tullock, G. (1974). The social dilemma: The economics of war and revolution. Blacksburg: University Publications.
Wright, J. D. (1976). The dissent of the governed: Alienation and democracy in America. New York: Academic Press.
Zimmermann, E. (1983). Political violence, crises, and revolutions: Theories and research. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
Zimmermann, E. (1990). On the outcomes of revolutions: Some preliminary considerations. Sociological Theory, 8(1), 33-47.
Zimmermann, E. (2024). Crucial elements for understanding democratization and autocratization. International Relations and Diplomacy, 12(5), 173-180.
Zimmermann, E., & Saalfeld, T. (1988). Economic and political reactions to the world economic crisis of the 1930s in six European countries. International Studies Quarterly, 32(3), 305-334.