 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Factors Influencing Politeness in Interaction: A Case Study of Dissuasion Behavior
LI Yiman
Full-Text PDF
XML 54 Views
DOI:10.17265/1539-8072/2025.12.003
Peking University, Peking, China
Based on statistics from reality TV shows, this paper conducts binary logistic regression analyses on the relationships between social status, social distance, cost-benefit levels, and dissuasion strategies in dissuasion behavior. It finds that the directness/indirectness of strategies has limited impact on politeness levels in Chinese dissuasive speech acts and is not a key factor influencing politeness. Further analysis of the linguistic forms, behavioral combinations of dissuasion, and their relationships with social status, social distance, and cost-benefit levels reveals a critical gradient distinction among factors affecting the politeness of dissuasion. Specifically, sentence structure choice is a key factor; performative verbs and cognitive stance markers are secondary factors; and direct/indirect language strategies, tag questions, and behavioral combinations are marginal factors.
dissuasion
behaviour, politeness level, indirectness, social variables, behavioral
combinations
LI Yiman, Factors Influencing Politeness in Interaction: A Case Study of Dissuasion Behavior. Sino-US English Teaching, December 2025, Vol. 22, No. 12, 275-288 doi:10.17265/1539-8072/2025.12.003
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A Cross-Cultural Study of Speech Act Realization Patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5, 196-213.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2009). On combining clauses and actions in interaction. Virittäjä, 3, 115.
Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2012). Turn continuation and clause combinations. Discourse Processes, 49, 273-299.
Couper-Kuhlen, E., & Selting, M. (2018). Interactional linguistics: Studying language in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J., & Terkourafi, M. (2017). Pragmatic approaches (im)politeness. In J. Culpeper, M. Haugh, and D. Z. Kádár (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of linguistic (im)politeness (pp. 11-39). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fang, M. (2017). Conventionalization and stance-taking in Chinese discourse. Peking: Peking University Press.
Feng, B., & Magen, E. (2016). Relationship closeness predicts unsolicited advice giving in supportive interactions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(6), 751-767.
Feng, H. (2015). Understanding cultural variations in giving advice among Americans and Chinese. Communication Research, 42(8), 1143-1167.
Hao, C. X. (2000). A study on the realization patterns of speech acts in English and Chinese. Journal of Shanxi Normal University (Social Science Edition), 28(1), 123-126.
Hinkel, E. (1997). Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple-choice data. Applied Linguistics, 18(1), 1-26.
Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness; or minding your P’s and Q’s. In Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 292-305). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leech, G. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Li, J. (2001). An analysis of the relationship between the use of causative means and situations. Modern Foreign Languages, 24(4), 360-377+359.
Liu, Y. Q., & Tao, H. Y. (2011). Indexing evaluative stances with negative rhetorical interrogatives in Mandarin conversation. Studies of the Chinese Language, 60(2), 110-120+191.
Ran, Y. P. (2018). The principle of renqing in interpersonal relationship management from the perspective of interpersonal pragmatics. Journal of Foreign Languages (Journal of Shanghai International Studies University), 41(4), 44-53 & 65.
Song, Z. Y., & Tao, H. Y. (2008). A comparative study of Chinese and English causal clause sequences in discourse. Chinese Linguistics, 5(4), 61-71+96.
Terkourafi, M. (2015). Conventionalization: A new agenda for im/politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 11-18.
Thompson, S. A., & Elizabeth, C. K. (2005). The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies, 7, 481-505.
Xu, J. N., & Hao, X. (2019). Pragmatic regulation on the internal modification of suggestive speech acts. Chinese Teaching in the World, 33(3), 353-368.
Xu, J. N. (2012). The epistemic stance marker “wǒ juéde”. Chinese Teaching in the World, 26(2), 209-219.
Yao, S. Y. (2024). Action-oriented approach to spoken grammar research. Chinese Linguistics, 21(1), 31-45.
Zhang, W. X. (2022). The construction of action syllabus for teaching Chinese as a second language from the perspective of interactional linguistics. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 44(6), 34-44.