 |
[email protected] |
 |
3275638434 |
 |
 |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
WANG Wenjing, ZHI Yuying
Full-Text PDF
XML 9 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2026.01.005
University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
Post-match interview is a medium for athletes to showcase their impressions. This paper focus on the discourse of a post-match interview by Chinese athletes in the sport of table tennis at the 2024 Paris Olympics using the face-saving theory as the main framework introduced by Brown and Levinson (1987). In addition, theoretical extensions (Gu, 1990; Mao, 1994; Gao, 1996) are also used to explain conceptions of face in the Chinese context. This study adopts a qualitative case study approach to investigating how athletes construct and maintain their face. It specifically analyzes the positive face, negative face, and redressive strategies. The findings indicate that Chinese athletes commonly adopt strategies such as emphasizing collective honor, humor, and indirect expressions to address face issues. These strategies are related to the collectivist values that are embedded in Chinese culture. This study extends the application of face theory to the under-explored domain of sports discourse and offers insights for future studies in sports communication and intercultural pragmatics.
face-saving theory, post-match interview, positive face, negative face
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chovanec, J. (2021). Saving one’s face from unintended humour: Impression management in follow-up sports interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 176, 198-212.
Cunningham, I., Simmons, P., & Mascarenhas, D. (2018). Sport officials’ strategies for managing interactions with players: Face-work on the front-stage. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 39(1), 154-162.
File, K. (2012). Post-match interviews in New Zealand rugby: A conciliatory media interview genre. N. Z. Engl. J., 26(1), 1-22.
File, K. A., & Schnurr, S. (2019). That match was “a bit like losing your virginity”. Failed humour, face and identity construction in TV interviews with professional athletes and coaches. Journal of Pragmatics, 152, 132-144.
Gao, G. (1996). Self and other: A Chinese perspective on interpersonal relationships. In W. B. Gudykunst, S. Ting-Toomey, and T. Nishida (Eds.), Communication in personal relationships across cultures (pp. 81-101). London: Sage.
Gu, Y. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2), 237-257.
Haugh, M. (2007). The discursive challenge to politeness research: An interactional alternative. Journal of Politeness Research, 3, 295-317
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. London: Sage Publications.
Hwang, K. K. (2006). Moral face and social face: Contingent self-esteem in Confucian society. International Journal of Psychology, 41(4), 276-281.
Mao, L. R. (1994). Beyond politeness theory: “Face” revisited and renewed. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 451-486.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 639-656.
Spencer-Oatey, H. (Ed.). (2008). Culturally speaking second edition: Culture, communication and politeness theory. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Tseng, M. Y., & Chen, H. (2022). Mutual face-maintaining acts: An analysis of talks between NBA referees and players/coaches. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 44-52.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.