![]() |
[email protected] |
![]() |
3275638434 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Paper Publishing WeChat |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Transcendence as a Prerequisite for Understanding the New in the Field of Art
Anvar Gofirovich Mukhiddinov
Full-Text PDF
XML 5 Views
DOI:10.17265/2159-5836/2026.01.009
Fergana State University, Fergana, Uzbekistan
transcendence, noninvasive method, DNA calculus, cognitive science, ideation
Adleman, L. M. (August 1998). Computing with DNA. Scientific American, 279(2), 54-61.
Atwood, W. G. (1999). The Parisian worlds of Frédéric Chopin. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Baumgart, F. (1977). DuMont’s kleines Sachlexikon der Architektur. Köln M. DuMont Schauberg.
Givón, T. (1979). Discourse and syntax. Syntax and semantics (Vol. 12). New York: Academic Press.
Hamlin, T. (1952). The rise of eclecticism in New York. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 11, 3-8.
Humphrey, N. K. (1976). The social function of the intellect. In P. P. G. Bateson and R. A. Hinde (Eds.), Growing points in ethology (pp. 303-317). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Husserl, E. (2005). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Third Book: Phenomenology and the Foundation of the Sciences.
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near. New York: Viking.
Lachs, J. (1997). Transcendence in philosophy and in everyday life. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy. New Series, 11(4), 247-255.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, J., & Jonson, M. (1999). Philosophy in flesh. New York: Basic Books.
Zamoyski, A. (2010). Chopin: Prince of the romantics. London: HarperCollins.




